# Fury 2
Overview
The Fury 2 is an ultra-compact portable dry herb vaporizer manufactured by Healthy Rips, released as the successor to the original Fury. It employs a hybrid conduction/convection heating method, with community members noting that it has "more convection going on" compared to some competitors. Powered by an internal rechargeable lithium-ion battery, the Fury 2 quickly earned a reputation within the vaporizer community as an accessible, budget-friendly portable that punched well above its price class. At approximately $125 USD at retail, it was widely regarded as one of the best values in portable vaporization during its production years (circa 2017–2019), before being succeeded by the Fury Edge and later models in the Healthy Rips lineup.
Specifications
| Specification | Detail |
| Manufacturer | Healthy Rips |
| Heating Method | Hybrid (conduction/convection) |
| Power Source | Internal rechargeable lithium-ion battery |
| Heat-Up Time | Approximately 20–30 seconds |
| Session Length | Approximately 4 minutes (auto-shutoff) |
| Temperature Range | 320°F–430°F (160°C–221°C), adjustable in 1° increments |
| Display | OLED screen |
| Chamber Size | Approximately 0.1–0.15g (full pack) |
| Battery Life | Approximately 4–6 bowls per charge |
| Charging | USB charging (non-proprietary) |
| Battery | Non-replaceable |
| Compatible Accessories | WPA (water pipe adapter), bent glass stem, bubbler attachment, dosing capsules |
| Dimensions | Palm-sized; described by users as able to "disappear in the palm of my hand" |
Community Reception
The Fury 2 was widely praised across the vaporizer community as an exceptional entry-level and everyday portable vaporizer. Its combination of small size, fast heat-up time, good vapor quality, and low price point earned it consistent recommendations in purchase advice threads spanning several years.
Pros:
- Extreme portability and stealth. Multiple community members emphasized that the Fury 2 could be concealed entirely in one's palm, making it one of the most discreet battery-powered vaporizers available. It was frequently described as resembling an e-cigarette closely enough that it would not draw attention in social settings.
- Fast heat-up time. At roughly 20–30 seconds, it was significantly faster than many competing portables, which users who came from longer-session devices particularly appreciated.
- Easy to use. The community consistently noted that the Fury 2 required no technique or learning curve. As one community member put it, "draw speed and technique don't matter," making it excellent for sharing with friends or converting smokers from combustion.
- Good vapor quality. Described as producing smooth hits even at high temperatures, with good flavor and respectable cloud production for its size.
- Precise temperature control. The single-degree temperature adjustment via the OLED display was well-regarded.
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio. At around $125, it was frequently cited as one of the best values in the portable vaporizer market.
- Versatile accessory ecosystem. The availability of glass stems, WPA, bubbler, and dosing capsules expanded its utility considerably.
Cons:
- Battery life. This was the most consistently cited weakness. At 4–6 bowls per charge, the internal battery limited extended sessions and group use. One community member noted that for social sharing "you might need a couple Furys to keep the party going."
- Non-replaceable battery. The sealed internal battery was a dealbreaker for some users who preferred vaporizers with user-swappable 18650 cells. Multiple community members reported that after approximately three years of use, the battery would no longer hold a charge, effectively ending the device's useful life.
- Short session timer. The 4-minute auto-shutoff session was noted as a limitation for those who preferred longer, slower extraction. (The successor Fury Edge added an extra minute.)
- Standard mouthpiece material concerns. Some users expressed dissatisfaction with the silicone mouthpiece, preferring the all-glass vapor path provided by the optional glass stems or WPA. The original Fury had notable silicone odor issues; the Fury 2 improved on this significantly, though a slight smell upon initial use was still reported by some.
- Lack of harsh density for smoker converts. One experienced community member noted that while the Fury 2 was a good tool for converting smokers, "many ex-smokers miss the slightly harsh density, which the Fury 2 does not really provide."
Tips & Techniques
Loading
- Grind consistency matters. A medium to fine grind was generally recommended for optimal extraction.
- Pack level. The community found that the chamber "likes to be at least half full to get good clouds" when used without glass accessories. Under-packing without a spacer or dosing capsule could result in diminished vapor production.
- Dosing capsules for microdosing. For users who found the full chamber too large, the official Healthy Rips dosing capsules were frequently recommended. These held a smaller amount of herb and worked with the standard mouthpiece. Community members confirmed that capsules allowed users to "turn the Fury 2 off after a couple of inhales and turn on again later without adding more herb."
- WPA as a microdosing tool. Medical users discovered that packing a small amount of flower directly into the glass WPA (rather than the chamber) allowed for effective microdosing, as the glass piece occupied space in the chamber and reduced the effective bowl size.
Draw Technique
- The Fury 2 was noted for requiring no particular draw technique, making it beginner-friendly. Slow to moderate draws worked well across the temperature range.
- Users could take a few draws, turn the device off, and return later to finish the bowl, though flavor quality diminished on subsequent sessions.
Social Use
- The community regarded the Fury 2 as one of the best vaporizers for sharing in a group setting due to its simplicity — "draw speed and technique don't matter, it's very small and discreet, durable, easy loading unloading, great vapor, great temp control, good clouds, smooth hits even at high heat."
Battery Management
- Because battery life was limited, experienced users recommended carrying a USB power bank to extend sessions away from home. One community member specifically noted that "it is also easier to carry around a power bank to charge both my phone and vape, than to carry around proprietary batteries."
Temperature Guide
While the community threads reviewed did not contain extensive temperature-specific discussions for the Fury 2 in particular, the following general guidance was consistent with reported usage:
| Temperature Range | Effect | Notes |
| 320°F–355°F (160°C–180°C) | Flavor-focused, light effects | Best for tasting terpenes; wispy vapor |
| 356°F–385°F (180°C–196°C) | Balanced flavor and effects | Community sweet spot for most users |
| 386°F–410°F (197°C–210°C) | Stronger effects, thicker clouds | Reduced flavor but increased efficiency |
| 411°F–430°F (211°C–221°C) | Maximum extraction | Used to finish bowls; described as still smooth even at high heat |
The Fury 2 was noted for producing smooth vapor across its entire temperature range, which was a distinguishing characteristic compared to some competitors.
Maintenance & Cleaning
While detailed cleaning protocols were not extensively documented in the reviewed threads, community members touched on several maintenance points:
- Glass accessories (WPA, bent stem, bubbler): These provided an all-glass vapor path and were easier to keep clean than the standard mouthpiece. Soaking in isopropyl alcohol was the standard cleaning method.
- Chamber: Regular brushing of the chamber after sessions was recommended to prevent residue buildup. The chamber could become discolored with use; one user selling their unit specifically noted that using only dosing capsules and glass attachments had kept the oven "not discolored at all."
- Dosing capsules: These reduced direct contact between herb and the chamber, making maintenance easier and extending the time between deep cleans.
- Screen replacement: The chamber screen could be replaced. At least one user in a comparison thread mentioned cutting a replacement screen from a pipe screen to improve airflow.
- Mouthpiece: The standard silicone mouthpiece required periodic cleaning to prevent buildup and odor.
The community considered the Fury 2 easier to clean than the Pax 3 — one user specifically cited the Pax's "cleaning process" as a reason for switching to the Fury platform.
Common Issues & Fixes
Battery Degradation
The most widely reported long-term issue was battery degradation. Multiple users reported that after approximately two to three years of regular use, the Fury 2's internal battery would no longer hold a charge. Because the battery is not user-replaceable, this effectively ended the device's lifespan. This was a known trade-off of the compact sealed design.
Workaround: Some users carried a USB power bank for on-the-go charging. Others simply accepted the Fury 2 as a device with a finite lifespan given its modest price and treated it accordingly.
Initial Silicone Odor
While significantly improved over the original Fury, some users reported a slight silicone smell when the unit was first opened. Community members noted this "soon dissipates" after a few initial heat cycles (burn-off sessions).
Fix: Run several empty heat cycles at maximum temperature before first use with herb.
Session Timer Too Short
The 4-minute auto-shutoff was a limitation for slower session users.
Workaround: The device could be quickly restarted for another session on the same bowl. The Fury Edge successor extended the session time by one minute and was recommended for users who needed longer sessions.
Chamber Requires Minimum Fill
Without accessories, the chamber performed best when at least half-full.
Fix: Use dosing capsules for smaller loads, or insert glass accessories (bent stem, WPA) which occupy chamber space and effectively reduce bowl size.
Accessories & Modifications
The Fury 2 had a robust accessory ecosystem that was central to the community's experience with the device:
Water Pipe Adapter (WPA)
The glass WPA was one of the most frequently recommended accessories. It provided an all-glass vapor path (eliminating concerns about the silicone mouthpiece), improved flavor, and allowed connection to water pieces for cooled vapor. It was also used creatively for microdosing by packing herb into the glass piece itself. The WPA came in standard and 18mm sizes.
Bent Glass Stem
The curved glass mouthpiece was widely praised for improving both flavor and vapor quality. One community member noted that receiving their bent stem and WPA "greatly improves taste" to the point of rivaling the Arizer Air's glass stem experience. The trade-off was reduced portability compared to the standard mouthpiece.
Bubbler Attachment
A glass bubbler could be attached directly to the Fury 2, providing water filtration without a separate water piece.
Dosing Capsules
Small stainless steel capsules that pre-loaded into the chamber. Praised for:
- Enabling microdosing with smaller loads
- Keeping the chamber clean
- Allowing pre-loading multiple capsules for on-the-go use
- Working with the standard mouthpiece (no additional accessories needed)
European users noted difficulty sourcing these capsules directly from Healthy Rips due to customs and shipping costs.
POTV One Accessories
Cross-compatibility existed with accessories from the Planet of the Vapes One (a rebrand/variant of the Fury 2 platform). Community members listed POTV One mouthpieces and bent stems as compatible with the Fury 2.
Third-Party Accessories
Community member-run businesses (such as Delta 3D Studios) produced compatible accessories, including end caps for the Pax and other devices in the same portable category.
Comparisons
The Fury 2 was frequently compared to other portable vaporizers in community discussions:
vs. Arizer ArGo
A common comparison given both devices' ultra-portable form factors. The Fury 2 was preferred for its significantly faster heat-up time and lower price. The ArGo was preferred for its replaceable 18650 battery, which gave it a longer effective lifespan and unlimited session potential with spare batteries. One community member stated "Fury2 all the way. I like fast heat up time and the arizer is just too slow." However, users who prioritized replaceable batteries found the ArGo's design philosophy more sustainable long-term.
vs. Arizer Air (Original)
Both were owned simultaneously by multiple community members. The Fury 2 was noted for having "much less draw resistance" than the Air, greater stealth (the Air's glass stem made it conspicuous), and a more powerful heater. Initially the Air was considered superior in flavor, but users found that adding a glass bent stem or WPA to the Fury 2 brought it to parity. The Air's replaceable battery remained its key advantage.
vs. Fury Edge
The Edge was the direct successor, and users who owned both reported "very similar" performance in efficiency, clouds, and flavor. The Edge's advantages were an extra minute of session time, longer battery life, haptic vibration feedback, and a redesigned mouthpiece attachment system. Community consensus was that if purchasing new, the Edge was the better buy, but the Fury 2 at a discounted price remained an excellent value. One experienced user who owned both summarized: "if you use sparingly and battery life is no issue get a Fury2 for cheaper."
vs. Fierce
The Fierce was a larger device in the Healthy Rips family with a removable battery. It was recommended to users who wanted the Fury 2 experience with longer battery life and swappable cells, though some early units reportedly had off-gassing issues that led to returns. Its larger size made it less stealthy.
vs. Firewood 5
Community members considered the Firewood 5 a "vastly superior vape" in terms of on-demand convection performance, but it required "patience to learn how to use." The Fury 2 was positioned as the easier, more accessible option — suitable as a reliable backup or entry-level device, while the Firewood 5 was seen as a daily driver for experienced users willing to invest in technique.
vs. Pax 3
Users who had owned both generally found the Fury 2 superior in efficiency, ease of cleaning, and heat-up time, while the Pax 3 retained advantages in build quality, battery life, and the ability to be manipulated without looking at it. The Pax 3's larger bowl and conduction-dominant heating were considered less efficient. At least one community member who had owned a Fury 2, Firewood 5, and Arizer Solo 2 still preferred the Pax 3 overall, suggesting this comparison was a matter of personal priorities.
vs. DynaVap
When users sought a Grasshopper replacement, both the Fury 2 and DynaVap were recommended. The Fury 2's advantage was that it "can be used on the go, while doing anything else and require no technique," whereas the DynaVap required a torch and some technique but offered a butane-powered, battery-free experience with no concerns about plastic materials in the vapor path.
vs. Xmax V3 Pro
Both were positioned as budget-friendly portables. One community member found the V3 Pro "not very efficient using microdose loads (0.02g for example), too much huffing and puffing for such a tiny amount," suggesting the Fury 2's WPA microdosing technique may have offered advantages for very small loads.
As a Microdosing Platform
While the Fury 2 could be adapted for microdosing via dosing capsules and the WPA loading technique, the community generally acknowledged that dedicated microdosers such as the Vapman, Tinymight, DynaVap, and Anvil were superior for very small loads (0.02g and below). The Fury 2's strength in this regard was its adaptability rather than being purpose-built for the task.